Girish Mahajan (Editor)

Simon and Schuster, Inc. v. Crime Victims Board

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Citations
  
502 U.S. 105 (more)

Concurrence
  
Kennedy

Concurrence
  
Blackmun

End date
  
1991

Full case name
  
Simon & Schuster, INC., petitioner v. Members of New York State Crime Victims Board et al.

Prior history
  
On certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Majority
  
O'Connor, joined by Rehnquist, White, Stevens, Scalia, Souter

Similar
  
RAV v City of St Paul, Virginia v Black, Chaplinsky v New Hampshire, Hustler Magazine v Falwell, United States v Eichman

Simon & Schuster v. Crime Victims Board, 502 U.S. 105 (1991), was a Supreme Court case dealing with Son of Sam laws, which are state laws that prevent convicted criminals from publishing books about their crime for profit. Simon & Schuster challenged the law's application to profits from Nicholas Pileggi's book Wiseguy: Life in a Mafia Family, which was written with paid assistance from former mobster Henry Hill. The court struck down the Son of Sam law in New York on the ground that the law was violative of the First Amendment, which protects free speech. Nevertheless, similar laws in other states remain unchallenged. The opinion of the court was written by Sandra Day O'Connor.

In the wake of this case, New York modified its law to apply to any economic benefits derived from criminal activities, not just proceeds from publications.

References

Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Crime Victims Board Wikipedia