Concurrence Burger | End date 1975 | |
Full case name Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., Secretary of Defense, et al. v. Bruce R. Councilman Citations 420 U.S. 738 (more)
95 S. Ct. 1300; 43 L. Ed. 2d 591; 1975 U.S. LEXIS 51; 21 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 1029 Prior history Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Majority Powell, joined by Stewart, White, Blackmun, Rehnquist; Douglas, Brennan, Marshall (part II only) Concur/dissent Brennan, joined by Douglas, Marshall Ruling court Supreme Court of the United States Similar Ex parte Quirin, Hamdan v Rumsfeld, Hamdi v Rumsfeld | ||
Schlesinger v. Councilman, 420 U.S. 738 (1975), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States.
The case was a key part of government arguments in the 2006 case of Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, defending its contention that the Supreme Court should not have heard the case, because Hamdan was still being processed by a military tribunal court in Guantanamo Bay.
Both the majority opinion by Justice John Paul Stevens and the dissenting argument of Justice Antonin Scalia referenced the case.
References
Schlesinger v. Councilman Wikipedia(Text) CC BY-SA