Puneet Varma (Editor)

Re Lucking's Will Trusts

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Court
  
High Court of Justice

Citation(s)
  
[1968] 1 WLR 866, [1967] 3 All ER 726

Similar
  
Bartlett v Barclays Bank Tru, Speight v Gaunt, Learoyd v Whiteley

Re Lucking's Will Trusts [1968] 1 WLR 866 is an English trusts law case concerning the duty of care of a trustee, and the requirement to become involved in the governance of companies in which the trust has an interest.

Contents

Facts

Two trustees, L and B held 70 per cent of shares in a shoe accessory company, with 20 factory employees, 2 travellers and an agency in France. 29 per cent belonged to L and 1% to his wife. The company directors were Mr and Mrs L, as well as D who managed the business. D wrongfully took £15,000 from the bank account and later went bankrupt, losing the money. The beneficiaries of the trust sued the trustees for breach of their duty of care.

Judgment

Cross J held that the trustees had breached their duty of care, and that they should have become involved in the company's management to prevent the misappropriation of the company's assets taking place. He continued as follows.

Significance

In Bartlett v Barclays Bank Trust Co Ltd, Brightman J interpreted the case as follows.

References

Re Lucking's Will Trusts Wikipedia


Similar Topics