Trisha Shetty (Editor)

R v Schoonwinkel

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Full case name
  
R v Schoonwinkel

Citation(s)
  
1953 (3) SA 136 (C)

End date
  
March 11, 1953

Charge
  
culpable homicide

Judge sitting
  
Steyn J and assessors

Court
  
Cape Provincial Division

Decided
  
11 March 1953 (1953-03-11)

In R v Schoonwinkel, an important case in South African criminal law, particularly as it applies to the defence of automatism, the driver of a motor vehicle was charged with culpable homicide, having collided with and killed a passenger in another car. The accused had suffered an epileptic fit at the time of the accident, rendering his mind a blank. The nature of his epilepsy was such that he would normally not have realised or foreseen the dangers of driving, having had only two previous minor attacks, the last a long time before the accident. This evidence, distinguishing this case from R v Victor, exonerated him from criminal responsibility. The court found additionally that this was not a case falling under the provisions of the Mental Disorders Act, read with section 219 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

References

R v Schoonwinkel Wikipedia