Neha Patil (Editor)

R v Hughes

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Decided
  
11 March 2002

End date
  
March 11, 2002

R v Hughes

Full case name
  
The Queen, Appellant v Peter Hughes, Respondent

Citation(s)
  
[2002] UKPC 12, [2002] 2 AC 259, [2002] 2 WLR 1058

Prior action(s)
  
Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court (from Saint Lucia)

Ruling court
  
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council

People also search for
  
Reyes v R, Fox v R, Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally, R v Williams

R v Hughes is a 2002 Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) case in which it was held that it was unconstitutional in Saint Lucia for capital punishment to be the mandatory sentence for murder. The JCPC held that because the Constitution of Saint Lucia prohibits "inhuman or degrading punishment", following a murder conviction, a trial judge must have discretion to impose a lesser penalty than death by hanging; capital punishment may be applied only in those cases that contain aggravating factors as compared to other murder cases.

The case was decided with Reyes v R and Fox v R, cases on the same issue on appeal from Belize and Saint Kitts and Nevis.

References

R v Hughes Wikipedia