Neha Patil (Editor)

R v DB

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Citations
  
2008 SCC 25

Docket number
  
31,460

Docket No.
  
31460

Ruling court
  
Supreme Court of Canada

R v DB

Full case name
  
Her Majesty The Queen v. DB

Majority
  
Abella J. (paras. 1-102), joined by McLachlin C.J. and Binnie, LeBel and Fish JJ.

Dissent
  
Rothstein J. (paras. 103-192), joined by Bastarache, Deschamps and Charron JJ.

R v DB, 2008 SCC 25 is a constitutional law decision of the Supreme Court of Canada wherein a split Court held 5-4 that "presumptive offences" (offences where the offender is prosecuted as an adult) found in the Youth Criminal Justice Act is unconstitutional for violating Section Seven of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In its analysis, the majority found that it was a principle of fundamental justice that young people should be entitled to a presumption of diminished moral culpability.

References

R v DB Wikipedia