Trisha Shetty (Editor)

R M Turton and Co (in liq) v Kerslake and Partners

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Decided
  
2 December 1999

End date
  
December 2, 1999

Citation(s)
  
[2000] 3 NZLR 406

R M Turton & Co (in liq) v Kerslake & Partners

Full case name
  
R M TURTON & CO LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) Appellant v KERSLAKE & PARTNERS Respondent

Transcript(s)
  
Court of Appeal judgment

Ruling court
  
Court of Appeal of New Zealand

Judge sittings
  
John Henry, Ted Thomas, Kenneth Keith

R M Turton & Co (in liq) v Kerslake & Partners [2000] 3 NZLR 406 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding defamation claims in situations where a claim can be in both tort and contract.

Contents

Background

R M Turton were the head contractor for the Southland Health Board's building of the Queenstown hospital.

The SHB appointed the engineering firm Kerslake and Partners as the engineers for the build.

Turton installed the airconditioning units that Kerslake specified for the build, however these units were not powerful enough for the building, requiring Turton to spend $75,000 to fix.

Turton sued SHB for breach of contract, and Kerslake in tort.

Held

The court dismissed Turton's appeal, as Keslake did not owe Turton any duty of care.

References

R M Turton & Co (in liq) v Kerslake & Partners Wikipedia