Harman Patil (Editor)

Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Citations
  
514 U.S. 211 (more)

End date
  
1995

Concurrence
  
Breyer

Full case name
  
Ed Plaut, et ux., et al., petitioners v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., et al.

Majority
  
Scalia, joined by Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas

Dissent
  
Stevens, joined by Ginsburg

Similar
  
Bank Markazi v Peterson, Ex parte McCardle, Immigration and Naturaliz, Clinton v City of New York, City of Boerne v Flores

Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., 514 U.S. 211 (1995), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that Congress may not retroactively require federal courts to reopen final judgments. Writing for the Court, Justice Scalia asserted that such action amounted to an unauthorized encroachment by Congress upon the powers of the judiciary and therefore violated the constitutional principle of separation of powers.

References

Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc. Wikipedia