Kalpana Kalpana (Editor)

Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Ass'n

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Docket nos.
  
13–1041 13–1052

Concurrence
  
Alito

Dates
  
1 Dec 2014 – 9 Mar 2015

Citations
  
575 U.S. ___ (more)

Concurrence
  
Scalia

Location
  
United States of America

Full case name
  
Thomas E. Perez, Secretary of Labor, et al., Petitioners v. Mortgage Bankers Association, et al.; Jerome Nickols, et al., Petitioners v. Mortgage Bankers Association

Majority
  
Sotomayor, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan; Alito (expect part III-B)

Similar
  
Michigan v EPA, Alabama Legislative Black Ca, City of Los Angeles v Patel, Yates v United States

Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association, 575 U.S. ___ (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the D.C. Circuit's Paralyzed Veterans doctrine is contrary to a clear reading of the Administrative Procedure Act and "improperly imposes on agencies an obligation beyond the Act's maximum procedural requirements."

Opinion of the Court

Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor authored the opinion of the Court.

Associate Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas authored concurring opinions.

References

Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Ass'n Wikipedia