Neha Patil (Editor)

Pasadena City Board of Education v. Spangler

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
End date
  
1976

Full case name
  
Pasadena City Board of Education, et al. v. Spangler, et al.

Citations
  
427 U.S. 424 (more) 96 S. Ct. 2697; 49 L. Ed. 2d 599; 1976 U.S. LEXIS 77

Majority
  
Rehnquist, joined by Burger, Stewart, White, Blackmun, Powell

Dissent
  
Marshall, joined by Brennan

Similar
  
Green v County School B, Swann v Charlotte‑Mecklenburg Board of, Milliken v Bradley

Pasadena City Board of Education v. Spangler, 427 U.S. 424 (1976), was a United States Supreme Court case.

Parties and litigants

Phil C. Neal argued the cause for petitioners; with him on the briefs were Lee G. Paul, Peter D. Collisson, Robert G. Lane, Philip B. Kurland, and Alan L. Unikel.

Fred Okrand argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents Spangler et al. Solicitor General Bork argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Pottinger, Deputy Solicitor General Wallace, and Brian K. Landsberg.

Raymond B. Witt, Jr., filed a brief for the Board of Education of Chattanooga, Tenn., as amicus curiae. [427 U.S. 424, 427]

References

Pasadena City Board of Education v. Spangler Wikipedia