Kalpana Kalpana (Editor)

Mouat v Clark Boyce

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Decided
  
11 March 1992

End date
  
March 11, 1992

Citation(s)
  
[1992] 2 NZLR 559

Location
  
New Zealand

Mouat v Clark Boyce

Full case name
  
Dorothy Dean Mouat v Clark Boyce

Ruling court
  
Court of Appeal of New Zealand

Judge sittings
  
Robin Cooke, Baron Cooke of Thorndon, Ivor Richardson, Thomas Gault

Mouat v Clark Boyce [1992] 2 NZLR 559 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the award of damages for breach of contract.

Background

Dorothy Mouat was an elderly 72-year-old widow. Her son Robert Mouat wanted to borrow $100,000 for house alterations and for business expenses, and arranged for his mother to grant a mortgage over her Roydvale Avenue, Christchurch home as security for the loan.

When it came to sign the mortgage documents, Robert's solicitor refused to be party to the transaction, and Robert decided to use the law firm of Clark Boyce, whom were also his mother's solicitors.

Clarke Boyce informed Mrs Mouat 3 times that she should obtain independent advice, which she declined to do. In the end they got her to sign a form confirming that she refused to seek legal advice, and the mortgage documents were duly signed.

However, 2 years later, the inevitable happened, with Robert defaulting on the loan, and was later declared bankrupt as well.

Dorothy later sued Clarke Boyce for negligence.

References

Mouat v Clark Boyce Wikipedia