Harman Patil (Editor)

Money had and received

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit

An action for money had and received to the plaintiff's use is the name for a common law claim derived from the form of action known as indebitatus assumpsit. The action enabled one person to recover money which has been received by another: for example, where a plaintiff paid money to the defendant while labouring under a mistake of fact or where there was a total failure of consideration. The action was a personal action only available in respect of money, rather than other benefits. Where the benefit received by the defendant was services or goods, the appropriate action was a quantum meruit or a quantum valebat, respectively.

The action for money had and received formed a part of the law of quasi-contract. Although the forms of action were abolished in the mid-19th century, reference continues to be made to the action in modern pleading. The terminology of "quasi-contract" has been replaced by the more modern terminology of unjust enrichment in most common law jurisdictions.

Case law

  • Bingham v. Cabot 3 U.S. 19 (Dall.) (1795)
  • Kershaw v Kirkpatrick [1878] UKPC 4
  • Sinclair v Brougham [1914] AC 398
  • Jackson v Horizon Holidays Ltd [1975] 1 WLR 1468
  • Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd [1991] 2 AC 548
  • The Mikhail Lermontov [1990] 1 Lloyd's Rep 579
  • Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington LBC [1996] UKHL 12
  • Philip Collins Ltd v Davis [2000] 3 All ER 808
  • References

    Money had and received Wikipedia