Puneet Varma (Editor)

Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Citations
  
497 U.S. 547 (more)

End date
  
1990

Concurrence
  
Stevens

Full case name
  
Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Co

Subsequent history
  
No. 89-453, 277 U.S. App. D.C. 134, 873 F.2d 347, affirmed and remanded; No. 89-700, 278 U.S. App. D.C. 24, 876 F.2d 902, reversed and remanded.

Majority
  
Brennan, joined by White, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens

Dissent
  
O'Connor, joined by Rehnquist, Scalia, Kennedy

Similar
  
City of Richmond v JA Cr, Adarand Constructors - Inc v Peña, Regents of the University, Hopwood v Texas, Gratz v Bollinger

Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC, 497 U.S. 547 (1990), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that intermediate scrutiny should be applied to equal protection challenges to federal statutes using benign racial classifications. The Court distinguished the previous year's decision City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Company, 488 U.S. 469 (1989), by noting that it applied only to actions by state and local governments. Metro Broadcasting was overruled by Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña, 515 U.S. 200 (1995), which held that strict scrutiny should be applied to federal laws that use benign racial classifications.

References

Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC Wikipedia