Concurrence Breyer | End date 1996 | |
Full case name Medtronic, Inc., Petitioner 95-754 v. Lora Lohr, et vir; Lora Lohr, et vir, Petitioners 95-886 v. Medtronic, Inc. Citations 518 U.S. 470 (more)
116 S. Ct. 2240; 135 L. Ed. 2d 700; 1996 U.S. LEXIS 4260; 64 U.S.L.W. 4625; CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P14,634; 29 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 1077; 96 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4685; 96 Daily Journal DAR 7557; 10 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 83 Majority Stevens, joined by Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer (parts I, II, III, V, VII); Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg (parts IV, VI) Concur/dissent O'Connor, joined by Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas Similar Cipollone v Liggett Group - Inc, Arizona v United States, New York v United States | ||
Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996), is a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the scope of federal preemption.
It was later limited by Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008).
References
Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr Wikipedia(Text) CC BY-SA