Harman Patil (Editor)

Mazer v. Stein

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Full case name
  
Mazer v. Stein

End date
  
1954

Citations
  
347 U.S. 201 (more) 74 S.Ct. 460. 98 L.Ed. 630

Prior history
  
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Majority
  
Reed, joined by Warren, Frankfurter, Jackson, Burton, Clark, Minton

Concurrence
  
Douglas, joined by Black

Mazer v. Stein, 347 U.S. 201 (1954), was a copyright case decided by the United States Supreme Court. In an opinion written by Justice Stanley F. Reed, the Supreme Court held that the statuettes—male and female dancing figures made of semivitreous china—used as bases for fully equipped electric lamps were copyrightable, even though the lamp itself was a utilitarian mass-produced item.

The case is notable for the quotation, "Unlike a patent, a copyright gives no exclusive right to the art disclosed; protection is given only to the expression of the idea—not the idea itself." 347 U.S. at 217 (citing F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Contemporary Arts, 193 F.2d 162; Ansehl v. Puritan Pharmaceutical Co., 61 F.2d 131; Fulmer v. United States, 122 Ct. Cl. 195, 103 F.Supp. 1021; Muller v. Triborough Bridge Authority, 43 F.Supp. 298.)

References

Mazer v. Stein Wikipedia