Trisha Shetty (Editor)

Maynard v. Cartwright

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Full case name
  
Maynard v. Cartwright

End date
  
1988

Citations
  
486 U.S. 356 (more)

Majority
  
White, joined by unanimous

Concurrence
  
Brennan, joined by Marshall

Ruling court
  
Supreme Court of the United States

Similar
  
Tison v Arizona, Ford v Wainwright, Coker v Georgia, Ring v Arizona, Thompson v Oklahoma

Maynard v. Cartwright, 486 U. S. 356 (1988), is a United States Supreme Court case in which a unanimous Court found that the "especially heinous, atrocious or cruel" standard for the application of the death penalty as defined by the Eighth Amendment was too vague. As such, Oklahoma's law was overturned based on Furman v. Georgia (1972).

Justice Brennan announced in a characteristic concurrence, joined by Justice Marshall, that he would adhere to his view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.

References

Maynard v. Cartwright Wikipedia