Rahul Sharma (Editor)

Martin v. Ohio

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Docket nos.
  
85-6461

Location
  
United States of America

Full case name
  
Earline Martin, Petitioner v. Ohio

Citations
  
480 U.S. 228 (more) 107 S. Ct. 1098; 94 L. Ed. 2d 267; 1987 U.S. LEXIS 933

Majority
  
White, joined by Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia

Dissent
  
Powell, joined by Brennan, Marshall (in full); Blackmun (as to Parts I and III)

Martin v. Ohio, 480 U.S. 228 (1987), is a criminal case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the presumption of innocence requiring prosecution to prove each element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt only applies to elements of the offense, and does not extend to the defense of justification, whereby states could legislate a burden on the defense to prove justification. The decision was split 5-4. The decision does not preclude states from requiring such a burden on the prosecution in their laws.

References

Martin v. Ohio Wikipedia