Neha Patil (Editor)

Lockhart v. United States (2016)

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Citations
  
577 U.S. ___ (more)

End date
  
March 1, 2016

Location
  
United States of America

Full case name
  
Avondale Lockhart v. United States

Majority
  
Sotomayor, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Alito

Dissent
  
Kagan, joined by Breyer

Similar
  
Betterman v Montana, Foster v Chatman, Hurst v Florida, Birchfield v North Dakota, Bank Markazi v Peterson

Lockhart v. United States, 577 U.S. ___ (2016), is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning the interpretation of a federal statute. 18 USC §2252(b)(2) states that a defendant convicted of possessing child pornography is subject to a mandatory 10 year minimum prison sentence if they have "a prior conviction...under the laws of any State relating to aggravated sexual abuse, sexual abuse, or abusive sexual conduct involving a minor or ward." Avondale Lockhart, convicted of possession of child pornography, had a prior convection for sexual abuse of his 53-year-old girlfriend under New York State law. He was sentenced to 10 years in prison under §2252(b)(2). He appealed claiming that the qualifier "involving a minor or ward" applies to the whole series, making his prior conviction not trigger the sentence enhancement. In a 6-2 decision, the Supreme Court held that the phrase only modifies the final item in the series, upholding the 10 year minimum sentence imposed on Lockhart.

References

Lockhart v. United States (2016) Wikipedia


Similar Topics