Girish Mahajan (Editor)

Lane v Shire Roofing Co (Oxford) Ltd

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Decided
  
16 February 1995

Judge sittings
  
Martin Nourse, Robin Auld

End date
  
February 16, 1995

Lane v Shire Roofing Co (Oxford) Ltd

Citation(s)
  
[1995] EWCA Civ 37, [1995] IRLR 493

Ruling court
  
Court of Appeal of England and Wales

Similar
  
O'Kelly v Trusthouse Forte plc, Carmichael v National Power plc, Nethermere (St Neots) Ltd v Gar, Pfeiffer v Deutsches Rotes Kre, James v Greenwich LBC

Lane v Shire Roofing Co (Oxford) Ltd [1995] EWCA Civ 37 is a UK labour law case concerning the scope of protection for people to employment rights. It took the view that for an employment contract to exist, the employee must be integrated in the business.

Contents

Facts

A building worker was hired by Shire Roofing to do jobs paid by the day, which was considered ‘prudent and advantageous to hire for individual jobs’. Mr Lane fell and was injured.

Judgment

In the High Court the judge found that Mr Lane was an independent contractor.

In the Court of Appeal, however, it was held by Henry LJ that, in relation to the porch job, this was the company’s business and not Mr Lane’s:

References

Lane v Shire Roofing Co (Oxford) Ltd Wikipedia


Similar Topics