Puneet Varma (Editor)

Johnson v. Zerbst

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Citations
  
304 U.S. 458 (more)

Dissent
  
McReynolds

End date
  
1938

Concurrence
  
Reed

Dissent
  
Butler

Johnson v. Zerbst sixthamendmentorgwpcontentuploads201301scc

Full case name
  
Johnson v. Zerbst, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Ga.

Majority
  
Black, joined by Hughes, Brandeis, Stone, Roberts

Similar
  
Powell v Alabama, Betts v Brady, Argersinger v Hamlin, Gideon v Wainwright, Alabama v Shelton

Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938), was a United States Supreme Court case, in which the petitioner, Johnson, had been convicted in federal court of feloniously possessing, uttering, and passing counterfeit money in a trial where he had not been represented by an attorney but instead by himself. Johnson filed for habeas corpus relief, claiming that his Sixth Amendment right to counsel had been violated, but he was denied by both a federal district court and the court of appeals.

Supreme Court involvement

The United States Supreme Court agreed to hear the case and overturned the decisions of the lower courts. In a six to two decision, the Court held that the federal court had infringed upon Johnson’s life and liberty by not giving him counsel to defend him during trial. In the majority opinion written by Justice Hugo Black, the Court held that,

This set the precedent that defendants have the right to be represented by an attorney unless they waive their right to counsel knowing full well the potential consequences. This precedent, however, only made this right applicable to federal defendants and did not extend to defendants in trials under state jurisdiction. Assistance of counsel was held to be requisite to due process of law in state felony proceedings with the Gideon v. Wainwright decision in 1963.

References

Johnson v. Zerbst Wikipedia