Harman Patil (Editor)

Jarecki v. G.D. Searle and Co.

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Citations
  
367 U.S. 303 (more)

End date
  
1961

Majority
  
Warren

Full case name
  
Jarecki, former Collector of Internal Revenue, et al. v. G.D. Searle & Co.

Jarecki v. G.D. Searle & Co., 367 U.S. 303 (1961)[1], was a U.S. Supreme Court case.

Jarecki is an example of the maxim noscitur a sociis—a word is known by the company it keeps. The Court noted that noscitur a sociis is not an inescapable rule. It further noted that the maxim is often wisely applied where a word is capable of many meanings. The reason that it is applied in the case of many meanings is that it avoids giving unintended breadth to Acts of Congress.

References

Jarecki v. G.D. Searle & Co. Wikipedia