Neha Patil (Editor)

Imbler v. Pachtman

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
End date
  
1976

People also search for
  
Connick v. Thompson

Full case name
  
Paul Kern Imbler, Petitioner, v. Richard Pachtman, District Attorney.

Citations
  
424 U.S. 409 (more) 96 S.Ct. 984, 47 L.Ed.2d 128 (1976)

Majority
  
Powell, joined by Burger, Stewart, Blackmun, Rehnquist

Concurrence
  
White, joined by Brennan, Marshall

Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976)[1], was a United States Supreme Court case in which district attorneys or prosecutors were found to have full immunity from civil suits resulting from their government duties.

Imbler, a defendant in a murder trial, had been convicted and sentenced when the district attorney, Pachtman, revealed new evidence that he said had recently surfaced and which exonerated Imbler. Imbler used the new evidence to successfully free himself, then brought up a civil suit alleging that Pachtman had withheld evidence. The suit, however, was dismissed on the grounds that Pachtman had prosecutorial immunity, a finding which the Supreme Court affirmed.

References

Imbler v. Pachtman Wikipedia


Similar Topics