Rahul Sharma (Editor)

Houston v. State

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit

Houston v. State, 583 S.W.2d 267 (1980), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of Tennessee that held that "repeated shots or blows" was sufficient circumstantial evidence to prove premeditation and deliberation for first degree murder.

Subsequent history

Houston was overruled by the case State v. Brown, which required more evidence than repeated blows to show deliberation.

References

Houston v. State Wikipedia