Girish Mahajan (Editor)

Homeguard Products (New Zealand) Ltd v Kiwi Packaging Ltd

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Decided
  
1981

Judge(s) sitting
  
Barker J

Citation(s)
  
[1981] 2 NZLR 322

Homeguard Products (New Zealand) Ltd v Kiwi Packaging Ltd

Court
  
High Court of New Zealand

Full case name
  
Homeguard Products (New Zealand) Limited v Kiwi Packaging Limited

Homeguard Products (New Zealand) Ltd v Kiwi Packaging Ltd [1981] 2 NZLR 322 is often cited regarding the banking of cheques tendered as full settlement of disputed accounts.

Contents

Background

Kiwi Packaging supplied Homeguard with packaging materials. For unexplained reasons, a dispute arose between the parties just what the final balance owing was. This was not helped by Kiwi packaging giving different amounts as the final balance, ranging from $901.84 to $1,187.60.

Homeguard thought the balance was even less than these amounts, with their calculation being for $765.97, and as a consequence, sent Kiwi Packaging a cheque for $765.97 with a note attached saying this amount was tendered "in full settlement of our account".

Kiwi Packaging, despite banking the cheque, sued Homeguard for the balance of $136 in the District Court, and won judgment for the balance remaining. Homeguard appealed to the High Court.

Decision

By banking the debtor’s cheque, Kiwi Packaging in effect consented to the terms attached to the cheque. Accordingly, the judge ruled that accord and satisfaction occurred, resulting in the debt being legally extinguished upon the creditor's banking of the cheque. Barker J said:

The court was silent on just how long "promptly" might mean.

References

Homeguard Products (New Zealand) Ltd v Kiwi Packaging Ltd Wikipedia


Similar Topics