Supriya Ghosh (Editor)

Hilton of Cadboll Stone

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Hilton of Cadboll Stone wwwnmsacukmedia111975hiltonfcadbollstonefro

Similar
  
Pictish stone, Dyce stones, St Vigeans Sculptured Stones M, Dupplin Cross, Meigle Sculptured Stone Mu

The Hilton of Cadboll Stone is a Class II Pictish stone discovered at Hilton of Cadboll, on the East coast of the Tarbat Peninsula in Easter Ross, Scotland. It is one of the most magnificent of all Pictish cross-slabs. On the seaward-facing side is a Christian cross, and on the landward facing side are secular depictions. The latter are carved below the Pictish symbols of crescent and v-rod and double disc and Z-rod: a hunting scene including a woman wearing a large penannular brooch riding side-saddle. Like other similar stones, it can be dated to about 800 AD.

Hilton of Cadboll Stone Hilton of Cadboll stone

The stone was formerly on in the vicinity of a chapel just north of the village. It was removed to Invergordon Castle in the 19th century, before being donated to the British Museum. The latter move was not popular with the Scottish public, and so it was moved once more, to the Museum of Scotland, where it remains today. A reconstruction, designed and carved by Barry Grove, was recently erected on the site.

Hilton of Cadboll Stone Hilton Of Cadboll stone as an insular manuscript by nikeyvv on

In 1998 excavation in the vicinity of the Hilton of Cadboll chapel site was undertaken by Kirkdale Archaeology (Paul Sharman and Jon Triscott) on behalf of Historic Scotland. During this work approximately 40 fragments of carved micaceous sandstone were recovered; the likely origin for these was surmised to be the Hilton of Cadboll stone.

Hilton of Cadboll Stone Hilton Of Cadboll stone by nikeyvv on DeviantArt

Subsequently, in 2001, Historic Scotland commissioned Kirkdale Archaeology (Dave Murray, Stuart Jeffrey, Meggen Gondek, and Angus Mackintosh) to undertake a further excavation. Assisted by Barry Grove, a further 740 carved sandstone fragments, and 122 possibly carved fragments, were recovered. In addition, the fabled missing lower portion of the cross-slab was discovered (by Angus Mackintosh), but left in-situ.

Hilton of Cadboll Stone Hilton of Cadboll Pictish Stone Ancient Scotland

Later in 2001 the lower portion of the cross-slab, along with several thousand more carved fragments, was recovered by Glasgow University Archaeological Research Division (GUARD) during an excavation funded by Historic Scotland. Following some controversy around where this section of the monument should be curated it was finally put on display in Hilton of Cadboll village hall rather than joining the upper portion at the Museum of Scotland. In parallel with the excavation, Historic Scotland also funded research carried out by Professor Sian Jones of the University of Manchester into the significance of Early Medieval Sculpture to local communities which concentrated on the historical fragmentation and movement of the Hilton of Cadboll monument as well its modern role in the production of meaning, value and place The excavation and subsequent analysis of the 'biography' of the monument was the foundation of a major monograph published by the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland in 2008. The digital elements of the excavation archive were deposited with the Archaeology Data Service.

Hilton of Cadboll Stone Hilton of Cadboll stone SEABOARD HISTORY

The goals of the 2001 GUARD excavation was meant to recover the remaining fragments of the carved stone and to provide context to the stone, and establish where and when it was erected. A topographic survey was carried out to produce a geographic information system (GIS). This data was used to plan a 100 square metre trench centred on the stone stump and extending to one metre beyond the furthest carved fragment previously recovered. The final trench dug measured 88.5 square metres.

Hilton of Cadboll Stone Hilton of Cadboll Stone Wikipedia

The GUARD excavation of the stump and carving fragments revealed that the cross held at least two previous settings. The east side of the stump matched the stone and was broken on both ends showing that there are still several pieces missing. Unlike the Hilton stone, only one side of stump had been carved which, in addition to the 1,134 carved fragments, showed that one of the faces of the Hilton of Cadboll Stone was re-carved. The broken stump was carefully removed from the site for conservation.

Hilton of Cadboll Stone FileHilton of cadboll stone Andrew Gibb 1856jpg Wikimedia Commons

The presence of 6 skeletons in burials shows that the stone was likely re-carved to mark the cemetery. Only one skeleton was fully excavated and removed after documenting and photographing the burial ''in situ'', the others were remained undisturbed throughout the excavation. Additionally, several metatarsals were removed for radiocarbon dating and were returned to the site once testing was complete. These burials contained various types of pottery and some stones with an unknown glaze on the surface.

Ten soil samples were taken from the site which appeared to contain charcoal or other evidence about the environment. These samples were subjected to optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating coupled with the analysis of the stratigraphy in order to establish the age and content of the soil. Five distinct levels were discovered in the soil which date from 9th century to present day. The laboratory tests revealed the true age of the stone.

References

Hilton of Cadboll Stone Wikipedia