Puneet Varma (Editor)

Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Docket nos.
  
14–151314–1520

Opinion announcement
  
Opinion announcement

Citations
  
579 U.S. ___ (more)

Full case name
  
Halo Electronics, Inc., Petitioner v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., et al.; Stryker Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Zimmer, Inc., et al.

Majority
  
Roberts, joined by unanimous

Concurrence
  
Breyer, joined by Kennedy, Alito

Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., 579 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the two-part Seagate test, used to determine when a district court may increase damages for patent infringement, is not consistent with Section 284 of the Patent Act.

Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice John Roberts authored a unanimous opinion.

References

Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc. Wikipedia


Similar Topics