Neha Patil (Editor)

Graham v. Richardson

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Date
  
1971

Full case name
  
Graham, Commissioner, Department of Public Welfare of Arizona v. Richardson, et al.

Citations
  
403 U.S. 365 (more) 91 S. Ct. 1848; 29 L. Ed. 2d 534; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 28

Majority
  
Blackmun, joined by Burger, Black, Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall

Concurrence
  
Harlan (in judgment and in parts III, IV)

Graham v. Richardson, 403 U.S. 365 (1971), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court determined that state restrictions on welfare benefits for legal aliens but not for citizens violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court invalidated an Arizona law that required citizenship or 15 years of residence to receive welfare benefits. The 9-0 decision was written by Harry A. Blackmun.[1]

The state argued that rational basis review should apply, which would require the non-citizen to prove that the law served no conceivable legitimate state interest, or alternatively that the law was not rationally related to the government's purpose. However, the court applied the strict scrutiny standard, holding, "Aliens as a class are a prime example of a 'discrete and insular' minority for whom such heightened judicial solicitude is appropriate."

References

Graham v. Richardson Wikipedia