Citations 471 U.S. 307 (more) | Dissent Powell | |
Full case name Francis, Warden v. Franklin Majority Brennan, joined by White, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens Dissent Rehnquist, joined by Burger, O'Connor |
Francis v. Franklin, 471 U.S. 307 (1985), is a United States Supreme Court decision reaffirming due process principles elucidated in Sandstrom v. Montana, that the prosecution bears the burden of proof of establishing the mental element of intent. Justice Brennan wrote that under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, a jury instruction saying that "a person of sound mind is presumed to intend the natural and probable consequences of his acts, but the presumption may be rebutted" is unconstitutional, because it shifted the burden of proof is shifted from the prosecution to the defense.
References
Francis v. Franklin Wikipedia(Text) CC BY-SA