Kalpana Kalpana (Editor)

Fernandez Vargas v. Gonzales

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Citations
  
548 U.S. 30 (more)

End date
  
2006

Dissent
  
Stevens

Full case name
  
Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales, Attorney General

Majority
  
Souter, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito

Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales, 548 U.S. 30 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case that considered Humberto Fernandez-Vargas, a Mexican citizen who, after being deported, illegally reentered the United States in 1982, and remained undetected for over 20 years, fathering a son in 1989 and marrying the boy’s mother, a U.S. citizen, in 2001. He filed an application to adjust his status to that of a lawful permanent resident, but the Government began proceedings to reinstate his 1981 deportation order under §241(a)(5), and deported him.

Fernandez-Vargas argued that because he illegally reentered the country before IIRIRA's effective date, §241(a)(5) did not bar his application for an adjustment of status, and that §241(a)(5) would be impermissibly retroactive if it did bar his adjustment application. The Court held that Section 241(a)(5) applies to those who reentered the U.S. before IIRIRA's effective date and does not retroactively affect any right of, or impose any burden on, the continuing violator of the INA now before this Court.

References

Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales Wikipedia