Trisha Shetty (Editor)

Extremal orders of an arithmetic function

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit

In mathematics, in number theory, the extremal orders of an arithmetic function are best possible bounds of the given arithmetic function. Specifically, if f(n) is an arithmetic function and m(n) is a non-decreasing function that is ultimately positive and

lim inf n f ( n ) m ( n ) = 1

we say that m is a minimal order for f. Similarly if M(n) is a non-decreasing function that is ultimately positive and

lim sup n f ( n ) M ( n ) = 1

we say that M is a maximal order for f. The subject was first studied systematically by Ramanujan starting in 1915.

Examples

  • For the sum-of-divisors function σ(n) we have the trivial result
  • because always σ(n) ≥ n and for primes σ(p) = p + 1. We also have lim sup n σ ( n ) ln ln n = e γ , proved by Gronwall in 1913. Therefore n is a minimal order and e−γ n ln ln n is a maximal order for σ(n).
  • For the Euler totient φ(n) we have the trivial result
  • because always φ(n) ≤ n and for primes φ(p) = p − 1. We also have lim inf n ϕ ( n ) ln ln n n = e γ , proved by Landau in 1903.
  • For the number of divisors function d(n) we have the trivial lower bound 2 ≤ d(n), in which equality occurs when n is prime, so 2 is a minimal order. For ln d(n) we have a maximal order ln 2 ln n / ln ln n, proved by Wigert in 1907.
  • For the number of distinct prime factors ω(n) we have a trivial lower bound 1 ≤ ω(n), in which equality occurs when n is a prime power. A maximal order for ω(n) is ln n / ln ln n.
  • For the number of prime factors counted with multiplicity Ω(n) we have a trivial lower bound 1 ≤ Ω(n), in which equality occurs when n is prime. A maximal order for Ω(n) is ln n / ln 2.
  • References

    Extremal orders of an arithmetic function Wikipedia