Docket nos. 12-52 Argument Oral argument | Citations 569 U.S. ___ (more) Dates 20 Mar 2013 – 13 May 2013 | |
Full case name Dan's City Used Cars, Inc. DBA Dan's City Auto Body v. Pelkey Majority Ginsburg, joined by unanimous Ruling court | ||
Dan's City Used Cars, Inc. v. Pelkey, 569 U.S. ___ (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that federal laws deregulating the transportation industry do not invalidate corresponding state provisions that regulate the seizure, storage, and sale of cars by towing companies. Robert Pelkey sued Dan's City Used Cars under New Hampshire law for unlawfully selling his vehicle. A lower court raised doubts as to whether the New Hampshire statute was valid at all, as Dan's City argued it was pre-empted by federal deregulation law, specifically, the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act, and the case eventually arrived before the Supreme Court. Agreeing with Pelkey, the justices named several conditions necessary for federal law to override state transportation regulations and narrowed the range of state transport laws subject to pre-emption.