The Coronation cases were a group of appellate opinions in English law cases, all arising out of contracts that had been made for accommodation for viewing the celebrations surrounding the coronation of King Edward VII and Queen Alexandra, originally scheduled for 26 June 1902. The King fell ill with appendicitis two days before the planned Coronation and it was postponed until 9 August.
In general, the contracts were voided on the ground of frustration of purpose. Certain contracts which did not mention that the purpose was to view the Coronation festivities were upheld, however.
The cases included:
Krell v Henry [1903] 2 K.B. 740
Chandler v Webster [1904] 1 KB 493
Herne Bay Steamboat Co v Hutton [1903] 2 K.B. 683
Hobson v Pattenden & Co (1903) 19 TLR 186
Clark v Lindsay (1903) 19 TLR 202
Griffith v Brymer (1903) 19 TLR 434
In this matter, the parties entered into the contract after the decision had been made (but not publicized) to operate on the King. The contract was ruled to be void, not under the doctrine of frustration of purpose as in other Coronation cases, but on the grounds of mistake. The crucial difference is that, unlike the other coronation cases where a later event made the contract fundamentally different, in this case the parties entered into the contract under the mistaken assumption of fact that the coronation would take place.
