Concurrence Rehnquist Concurrence Blackmun, O'Connor | Concurrence Marshall | |
Full case name Citizens Against Rent Control/Coalition for Fair Housing v. City of Berkeley, California Citations 454 U.S. 290 (more)
102 S. Ct. 434; 70 L. Ed. 2d 492; 1981 U.S. LEXIS 135 Majority Burger, joined by Brennan, Powell, Rehnquist, Stevens | ||
Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley, 454 U.S. 290 (1981), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States invalidated a California law that set limits on contributions to ballot issue campaigns. The ruling relies heavily on the Court's earlier decisions in Buckley v. Valeo, holding that limits on contributions to political candidates implicate the First Amendment, and First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, holding that the state governments have no compelling interest in limiting spending on speech about ballot issues.
References
Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley Wikipedia(Text) CC BY-SA