Puneet Varma (Editor)

Canadian Egg Marketing Agency v Richardson

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Citations
  
[1998] 3 S.C.R. 157

Ruling
  
Appeal allowed

Docket No.
  
25192

Docket number
  
25,192

Canadian Egg Marketing Agency v Richardson

Full case name
  
Canadian Egg Marketing Agency v. Pineview Poultry Products Ltd. and Frank Richardson operating as Northern Poultry

Prior history
  
Judgment against the Canadian Egg Marketing Agency in the Court of Appeal for the Northwest Territories.

Majority
  
Iacobucci and Bastarache JJ., joined by Lamer C.J. and L’Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, Cory, and Binnie JJ.

Canadian Egg Marketing Agency v Richardson, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 157 is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on standing to challenge a law as a violation of the Constitution of Canada. The Court expanded the exception first established in R. v. Big M Drug Mart to allow corporations to invoke the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in civil litigation. The corporation had claimed rights to freedom of association and freedom of movement under section 2(d) and section 6 of the Charter.

References

Canadian Egg Marketing Agency v Richardson Wikipedia