Harman Patil

Canada (AG) v Ward

Updated on
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Citations  [1993] 2 S.C.R. 689
Ruling  Appeal allowed.
Docket number  21,937
Docket No.  21937
Unanimous reasons by  La Forest J.
People also search for  Ward v Canada (AG)
Canada (AG) v Ward
Full case name  Patrick Francis Ward v. The Attorney General of Canada
Prior history  Judgment for the Attorney General of Canada in the Federal Court of Appeal.

Canada (AG) v Ward, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 689 is a leading immigration case decided by the Supreme Court of Canada on test for determining a "well-founded fear of persecution" in order to make a claim for Convention refugee status. The Court held that persecution need not originate from the state, and that mere inability to provide protection is sufficient to establish a claim for persecution.



Patrick Ward was a member of the Irish National Liberation Army. He was assigned to guard some hostages and when they were ordered to be killed he allowed them to escape. The INLA discovered that Ward has assisted in the escape from the police. They tortured him and sentenced him to death. He escaped and went to the police who discovered his involvement in the initial kidnapping so sent him to jail. Upon his release he escaped to Canada and claimed refugee status. His claim was initially rejected and was sent back for redetermination on appeal. The refugee determination board found he was a refugee, on appeal to the Federal Court of Canada the claim was rejected. Ward appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Opinion of the Court

La Forest J., writing for a unanimous Court, held that Ward did not fall into the convention refugee definition.


Canada (AG) v Ward Wikipedia

Similar Topics
Vietnam Nurses
Olga Serejnikova
Chris Evert