Full case name Camreta v. Greene Citations 563 U.S. 692 (more) Opinion announcement Opinion announcement | Docket nos. 09-1454 Argument Oral argument | |
Plurality Kagan, joined by Roberts, Ginsburg, Alito | ||
Camreta v. Greene, 563 U.S. 692 (2011), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that in the general case the Court may review a lower court’s constitutional ruling at the behest of government officials who have won final judgment on qualified immunity grounds but could not for this case due to details specific to it.
References
Camreta v. Greene Wikipedia(Text) CC BY-SA