Rahul Sharma (Editor)

Briscoe v. LaHue

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Full case name
  
Briscoe v. LaHue

End date
  
1983

Dissent
  
Brennan

Citations
  
460 U.S. 325 (more) 75 L. Ed.2d 96, 103 S. Ct. 1108 (1983)

Prior history
  
663 F.2d 713 (7th Cir. 1981)

Majority
  
Stevens, joined by Burger, White, Powell, Rehnquist, O'Connor

Dissent
  
Marshall, joined by Blackmun

Similar
  
Stump v Sparkman, Bivens v Six Unknown, Ashcroft v Iqbal

Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Title 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 did not authorize a convicted state defendant to assert a claim for damages against a police officer for giving perjured testimony at the defendant's criminal trial.

References

Briscoe v. LaHue Wikipedia