Neha Patil (Editor)

Bethel v Hillyard

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Decided
  
1885 (1885)

End date
  
1885

Judge sitting
  
James Stirling

Bethel v Hillyard

Citation(s)
  
Bethell v Hildyard 38 Ch.D. 220.

Bethell v Hildyard 38 Ch.D. 220. [1885 B. 2119.] is an important legal judgment of the Chancery Division of the High Court of Justice, England. The matter heard before Justice Striling concerned succession to property by the child of a marriage contracted by Christopher Bethell, an English man in Bechuanaland South Africa with Teepoo, a Barolong woman according to the customs of the Baralong people.

The marriage was held not to be a valid marriage according to the law of England because the customs of the Baralong people permitted polygamy. The child was held not entitled to succeed to her father's property.

References

Bethel v Hillyard Wikipedia