Supriya Ghosh (Editor)

Bell v. Wolfish

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Concur/dissent
  
Powell

End date
  
1979

Dissent
  
Marshall

Full case name
  
Griffin Bell, Attorney General, et al. v. Wolfish, et al.

Citations
  
441 U.S. 520 (more) 99 S. Ct. 1861; 60 L. Ed. 2d 447; 1979 U.S. LEXIS 100

Prior history
  
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Majority
  
Rehnquist, joined by Burger, Stewart, White, Blackmun

Ruling court
  
Supreme Court of the United States

Similar
  
Farmer v Brennan, Hudson v McMillian, Graham v Connor, United States v Salerno, Ashcroft v Iqbal

Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 (1979), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court found that it was not a violation of the Fourth Amendment to perform intrusive body searches on pre-trial detainees.[1]

Significance

This case arose as a challenge to the conditions under which pretrial defendants are confined. The petitioners claimed that in the absence of a conviction, subjecting incarcerated defendants automatically to the same conditions as convicted felons was unconstitutional punishment. The federal district court agreed with this view, holding that defendants could only be deprived of liberty as a matter of "compelling necessity". It was also determined that The Supreme Court felt that the possible innocence of pre-trial detainees should not prevent corrections officials from taking necessary steps to maintain their facility.

References

Bell v. Wolfish Wikipedia