Suvarna Garge (Editor)

Bell v. State

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Decided
  
July 9, 1971

Ruling court
  
Supreme Court of Georgia

End date
  
July 9, 1971

Bell v. State httpsuploadwikimediaorgwikipediacommonsthu

Citation(s)
  
227 Ga. 800, 183 S.E.2d 357 (1971)

Similar
  
Wilson v State, United States v Ross, Strickland v Washington, Apprendi v New Jersey, Batson v Kentucky

Bell v. the State of Georgia, 227 Ga. 800, 183 S.E.2d 357 (1971) is one of several cases in which the Supreme Court of Georgia set forth the standard by which an extraordinary motion for a new trial is to be judged.

In order for a defendant to succeed when making such a motion after having discovered new evidence, the defendant must show

These six criteria have appeared in a number of other decisions of the Georgia Supreme Court, including Timberlake v. the State and the majority opinion in Davis v. the State (see Troy Anthony Davis).

The case stemmed from an appeal for a conviction centered on child hearsay testimony. This court decision and similar ones in the same and other U.S. states are designed to ensure the finality of jury verdicts. It is therefore necessary for defense lawyers to present all exculpatory evidence at trial rather than bringing such evidence before the courts in a piecemeal manner; however, some have criticized the principle of finality of jury verdicts as increasing the possibility of errors in death penalty cases.

References

Bell v. State Wikipedia