Concurrence Black | ||
Full case name Baxstrom v. Herold, State Hospital Director Citations 383 U.S. 107 (more)86 S. Ct. 760; 15 L. Ed. 2d 620; 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2214 Majority Warren, joined by Fortas, Harlan, Brennan, Stewart, Clark, White, Douglas | ||
Baxstrom v. Herold, 383 U.S. 107 (1966), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that civil commitment following a prison term did not run afoul of double jeopardy principles.
References
Baxstrom v. Herold Wikipedia(Text) CC BY-SA