Puneet Varma (Editor)

Ballance Agri Nutrients (Kapuni) Ltd v The Gama Foundation

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Decided
  
05 November 2005

Transcript(s)
  
Copy of Judgement

End date
  
November 5, 2005

Citation(s)
  
(2005) 5 NZCPR 16

Location
  
New Zealand

Ballance Agri-Nutrients (Kapuni) Ltd v The Gama Foundation

Full case name
  
Ballance Agri-Nutrients (Kapuni) Ltd v The Gama Foundation

Ruling court
  
Court of Appeal of New Zealand

Judge sittings
  
William Young, Mark O'Regan, Bruce Robertson

Ballance Agri-Nutrients (Kapuni) Ltd v The Gama Foundation (2005) 5 NZCPR 16 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding whether a nominee stated in a contract is sufficiently designated in order for the Contracts (Privity) Act 1982 to apply.

Background

Ballance leased a Christchurch industrial property. In April 2001, Ballance had given 6 months notice that they were terminating the lease. At this date, the property was originally owned by Gama Holdings, but on 10 June 2001, ownership was transferred to the related company Gama Foundation.

Ballance were not notified of the sale at the time.

Due to the fact that the sale was a related party transaction, the sale was not registered until 9 months later in January 2002.

This delay caused problems for the landlord, when they sought payment for damages to the property, forcing Gama to seek payment as a permitted assignor under section 4 of the Contracts (Privity) Act 1982.

Ballance disputed that Gama Foundation was a permitted assignor.

References

Ballance Agri-Nutrients (Kapuni) Ltd v The Gama Foundation Wikipedia