Kalpana Kalpana (Editor)

Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Decided
  
17 December 1964

Prior action(s)
  
none

End date
  
December 17, 1964

Citation(s)
  
(1964) 111 CLR 353

Subsequent action(s)
  
none

Ruling court
  
Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria

Full case name
  
Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria

Judge(s) sitting
  
Barwick CJ, McTiernan, Kitto, Taylor, Menzies and Windeyer JJ

Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria (1964) 111 CLR 353 is a High Court of Australia case that dealt with section 90 of the Australian Constitution. In this case, following on from such cases as Dennis Hotels Pty Ltd v Victoria, Barwick CJ accepted the broad approach to the definition of an excise, but rejected the formalistic criterion of liability approach for determining if the excise falls at the relevant step. He adopted the substance over form approach, or the substantial effects doctrine, in that there are many factors to be considered, for example, the indirectness of the tax, its effect on the cost of goods and its proximity to the production or distribution of the goods.

References

Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria Wikipedia


Similar Topics