Citations [1993] 1 S.C.R. 897 Ruling Appeal granted. Docket number 22,256 | Docket No. 22256 Unanimous reasons by Sopinka J. | |
 | ||
Full case name Workers' Compensation Board and others v. Amchem Products Incorporated and others;
Workers' Compensation Board and others v. T & N plc;
Workers' Compensation Board and others v. The Flintkote Company Prior history Judgment against the Workers' Compensation Board by the Court of Appeal for British Columbia Similar Connelly v RTZ Corp plc, Adams v Cape Industries, United States v Windsor | ||
Amchem Products Inc v British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 897 is a leading decision on forum non conveniens by the Supreme Court of Canada. The Court overturned an anti-suit injunction issued by the British Columbia Supreme Court against the courts in Texas on the basis that the British Columbia (BC) court was not necessarily the better forum for the case.
Contents
Background
A number of BC residents began an action against several US manufacturers of asbestos in Texas. The Texas court accepted jurisdiction over the matter and heard the case. The manufacturers applied to the BC Supreme Court to issue an anti-suit injunction, arguing that the proper forum for the plaintiffs would be in BC and not Texas.
The BC Supreme Court issued the injunction. In response, Texas issued an "anti-anti-suit injunction". The BC Supreme Court judgment was upheld on appeal to the BC Court of Appeal.
Ruling of the Court
The Supreme Court of Canada overturned the judgment and found that there was insufficient grounds to deny Texas jurisdiction.
The Court adopts the test for forum non conveniens from Spiliada Maritime Corp. v. Cansulex Ltd., [1987] A.C. 460