Neha Patil (Editor)

Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Dissent
  
Clark

End date
  
1967

Full case name
  
Abbott Laboratories, et al. v. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, et al.

Citations
  
387 U.S. 136 (more) 87 S. Ct. 1507; 18 L. Ed. 2d 681; 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2974

Majority
  
Harlan, joined by Black, Douglas, Stewart, White

Dissent
  
Fortas, joined by Warren, Clark

Similar
  
Citizens to Preserve Overton P, Lujan v Defenders of Wildlife, Immigration and Naturaliz, South Dakota v Dole

Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner, 387 U.S. 136 (1967), was a case heard before the United States Supreme Court. Abbott Laboratories held that drug companies were not prohibited by the ripeness doctrine from challenging a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulation requiring a prescription drug's generic name to appear on all related printed materials. The government argued that the case was not ripe because the regulation had yet to be enforced; however, that argument failed as the Court found the issues to be fit for judicial resolution, and that the drug companies would experience substantial hardship if denied a pre-enforcement challenge to the statute. Prosecution for non-compliance was likely, civil and criminal penalties could be imposed, and the drug companies would suffer reputational damage if required to violate the regulation before challenging it in court.

Facts

The action was brought by individuals and associations accounting for more than 90% of the prescription drugs industry. Specifically, the petitioners challenged the decision by the Commissioner of Food and Drug to promulgate the "established name" rule pursuant to a statute granted by Congress. After inviting and considering comments submitted by interested parties, the Commissioner established the following rule:

If the label or labeling of a prescription drug bears a proprietary name or designation for the drug or any ingredient thereof, the established name, if such there be, corresponding, to such proprietary name or designation, shall accompany each appearance of such proprietary name or designation.

References

Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner Wikipedia


Similar Topics