Supriya Ghosh (Editor)

Williams v. Price

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Date decided
  
September 9, 2003

Williams v. Price

Full case name
  
Ronald A. Williams, Appellant v. James Price, Superintendent, SCI-Pittsburgh; D. Michael Fisher, Attorney General

Citation(s)
  
343 F.3d 223 (3d Cir. 2003)

Judge(s) sitting
  
Samuel Alito, Theodore A. McKee, & William Schwarzer

Ruling court
  
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Williams v. Price, 343 F.3d 223 (3d Cir. 2003) was a 2003 legal case decided in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. The appellant was Ronald A. Williams, an African American prisoner; the suit was brought against James Price, the prison superintendent of State Correctional Institution – Pittsburgh, and D. Michael Fisher, the then-Attorney General of Pennsylvania.

The case involved voir dire, a legal process in which potential jurors are asked questions to investigate their suitability for jury duty. Williams, serving life imprisonment for first-degree murder for the 1984 slaying of Archie Bradley in Cranberry Township, Butler County, Pennsylvania. Williams alleged that his Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury was abridged when jurors lied regarding their racial prejudices during voir dire. State courts had refused to consider the testimony of a witness who stated that a juror had uttered derogatory remarks about African Americans during an encounter in the courthouse after the conclusion of the trial.

Samuel Alito, writing the court's opinion, declared that "the state courts' refusal to receive some but not all of this evidence violated Williams's clearly established constitutional rights" The opinion granted a writ of habeas corpus to Williams.

References

Williams v. Price Wikipedia