Trisha Shetty (Editor)

Sioux City and Pacific Railroad Co. v. Stout

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
End date
  
January 26, 1874

Sioux City & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Stout

Full case name
  
Sioux City & Pacific R.R. Co. v. Stout

Citations
  
84 U.S. 657 (more) 21 L. Ed. 745; 17 Wall. 657

Majority
  
Hunt, joined by unanimous

Sioux City & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Stout, 84 U.S. 657 (1873), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that first enunciated the idea that a landowner could be liable for the injuries of a child trespasser.

Decision

A child was injured by a railroad turntable owned by Sioux City and Pacific Railroad, and the company was held liable despite the prevailing idea that a landowner was not held liable for injuries to trespassers. Trespassing children were thought to be a special case that required a higher duty of care. This theory of liability came to be known as the "turntable doctrine" and later the attractive nuisance doctrine by the case Keffe v. Milwaukee & St. Paul R.R. Co.

References

Sioux City & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Stout Wikipedia