Docket nos. 10-1219 Argument Oral argument | Citations 566 U.S. ___ (more) | |
Full case name David Kappos, Undersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office v. Gilbert P. Hyatt Prior history Decision against petitioner, unreported (BPAI 2001); summary judgement for defendant sub nom. Hyatt v. Dudas, 2006 WL 4606037 (D.D.C. 2005); affirmed sub nom. Hyatt v. Doll, 576 F.3d 1246 (Fed. Cir. 2009); vacated and remanded on en banc rehearing, 625 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2010); certiorari granted, 131 S.Ct. 3064 (2011) Majority Thomas, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan | ||
Kappos v. Hyatt, 566 U.S. ___ (2012), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that there are no limitations on a plaintiff's ability to introduce new evidence in a ยง145 proceeding other than those in the Federal Rules of Evidence and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
References
Kappos v. Hyatt Wikipedia(Text) CC BY-SA